Understanding the difference between a visa and status in the US — Part 2

Last week, I started this two-part series discussing the differences between Visas and Status.  Visas are just a document that indicates that someone at an Embassy or Consulate has reviewed your visa application and believes that you are qualified to enter the U.S. and that for the validity period of the visa, you are allowed to come to the US and request permission to enter the US in that status.

At the border, you will be examined by a customs inspector — an officer of U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP).  The officer, if he agrees that you meet the qualifications to enter the US in the requested category, will grant you status.  Status is permission to stay the US in the requested visa category.  That grant of status will also decide how long you may stay here in that visa category.

That grant of status is what is important.  He can give you one day of status, or he can give you two or three years or more.  Your status can end before the expiration date of your visa, but it can also extend past the date of your visa.  But, because of the great authority given to these border inspectors, their determination will almost always be the last word.

Several employment visas are governed by USCIS petition approval notices.  The R – r-ligious worker visa and the H – temporary professional worker visas, for example, cannot be issued for a period extending past the validity already approved by the USCIS.   But when you enter the US, the border guard will frequently feel free to completely disregard what is written in the approval notice, and go ahead and issue what he wants to.  As I stated above, thus frequently goes past the validity period of the visa and the petition.

It is my understanding that, officially, the USCIS does not like this situation.  It is their position that, if the border officer gives you extended time past the expiration of the petition approval, then you should go back and ask the CBP officer to “correct” it.   In general, if you do that, the CBP officer will refuse to do it, taking the position that he had the authority to do what he said.  And to be honest, I have never seen a USCIS officer give anyone a hard time for being past the end of his “petition-approved” status if he also had a currently valid I-94 from the CBP officer showing current status.

 I hope this is interesting and helpful. Remember that this is not legal advice. It is just a summary of certain aspects of immigration law which may or may not apply to your situation. I encourage you to consult an attorney if you think any of this may apply to your situation.

Gunnar Armstrong

Understanding the Difference Between a Visa and Status in the US — Part 1

I have people tell me all the time that their visa expires in six months, when what they really mean is that their stay here in the US expires in six months.   Likewise, I have had people say that they can stay here ten years because they have a ten-year tourist visa.  What is a visa?   And what does it have to do with how long you can stay in the US.

I will try to explain.   Like everything else in immigration law, it is a complicated concept.   A visa has nothing to do with how long you can stay in the US.   A visa is simply advanced permission to come to the border and ask if you can come in.   The idea behind a visa is that you have gone to an Embassy and they have said “We have reviewed this person, and, in our opinion, he is qualified to enter the US, and so we are giving him advanced permission to request permission to enter the US in the requested category.”  If they give you a 45-day visa, you have 45 days to come and request permission to enter the US in that category.   If they give you a 90-day visa, you have 90 days to come and request permission to enter the US in that category.   If they give you a ten-year visa, you have ten years to come and request permission to enter the US in that category.

In addition, they will give you either a one-entry visa or a multiple-entry visa.   A one-entry visa is just that — you are allowed to use it to enter the US only one time, and it must, of course, be within the validity period of that visa.    A multiple entry visa can be used for an unlimited number of entries during the validity period of the visa.

It is also important to remember that a visa is in no way a guarantee that you will be able to enter the US.   A visa only means that the Consulate talked to you and reviewed your documents and determined, to their satisfaction, that you are qualified to enter the US under the requested category.   It is not a determination that you are qualified and should be admitted.

When you come to the border, the border guard will make his own determination.   He has complete authority to decide that, regardless of the Consulate’s approval, he does not think that you are qualified to enter.   He will understand that the visa means that the Consulate reviewed your case, but he has complete discretion to ask his own questions and require his own evidence, and to decide that he does not agree; to decide that he thinks you do not qualify to enter under that visa.

Then, if he does let you in, he is the one who decides how long you may stay.  It has nothing to do with the length of time that the visa is valid.

I will continue this discussion next week, focusing on the “Status” side of the discussion.

I hope this is interesting and helpful.   Remember that this is not legal advice.  It is just a summary of certain aspects of immigration law which may or may not apply to your situation.   I encourage you to consult an attorney if you think any of this may apply to your situation.

Gunnar Armstrong

Non-Hague Convention Adoptions

Last week I spoke about the Hague Convention Adoption Process — which is difficult, expensive and time-consuming.   There are a number of other options for adoptions which can help in the immigration process.  I will lump them together under the title: Non-Hague Convention Adoptions.

The first class of adoptions I want to cover are orphan adoptions from a country that is not a part of the Hague Convention.   I could not find a list of these countries, and I didn’t want to take the time to go through the list of all the Hague Convention countries and figure out who is missing—but I can say that Russia and Ethiopia are not on the list — but neither of them allow adoptions by U.S. citizens at this time anyway.   But, if you should find an orphan in a country that is not a Hague Convention country and which allows adoption, then you can pursue an international adoption.   Much of what has been said about the Hague Convention Adoptions would also apply to these non-Hague Convention Adoptions, but there are significant differences.  You are allowed to meet the child before adopting.   Also, the adoption would not need to go through the other country’s Hague Convention approval office (because there would be no such office).  Omitting this step alone could be a major savings of time and expense.   Like with the Hague Adoption, the petition needs to be filed before the child turns 16, but it is not necessary to meet all the Hague Convention approvals before filing the petition, so you need less preparation time before filing.

There is another option for children (orphans or otherwise) from non-Hague Convention Countries if they entered the U.S. legally.  If they can be adopted by a US citizen while they are here in the US, and then stay here for two years in the custody of the U.S. citizen, they can then file for a green card and when it is approved, they will automatically receive U.S. citizenship.  The child must be completely adopted before reaching 16 years old, and the two years and the petition for a green card must be completed before reaching 21 years old.    I did this once for a child who was from a non-Hague Convention country.   This will usually NOT work for a child from a Hague Convention country, but it might in certain unusual situations.

There is one other option that is available—and this is even available in Hague Convention countries.  However, it will only work for a US citizen who is living abroad long-term.   If you are living long-term in a foreign country, and under the laws of that foreign country you are able to adopt a child before the child turns 16, then, once you have had the child living with you in your custody for two years, you can file for citizenship (or file to bring him to the US for citizenship) as long as you file the petition before the child turns 16.   The two years of required custody can start before the adoption as long as you have court-ordered custody.  There are a couple considerations for this type of immigration by adoption.  The first is that some countries don’t allow adoption by a foreigner.  The other is that some countries will allow you to stay long-term as a visitor but will not give you resident status.   If you are not allowed to “reside” in the country, it is possible that the US will say that the child was living with you but not “residing” with you because you were not “residing” there, you were just visiting.  This type of adoption is allowed outside the Hague Convention rules because of the two-years of residence abroad — turning the adoption into a local adoption instead of a foreign adoption.

Finally, I referred to adoptions that do not work for immigration purposes.   Most adoptions over the age of 16 will not work for immigration purposes.   The adoption may be legally valid for most purposes, but it cannot not be used for immigration purposes.   There are two exceptions to this rule.  The first is if the adoption is done thorough the orphan adoption procedures outlined above.   In that case, the adoption can be after 16 if the petition was filed before age 16.  The other is if a parent is adopting two children and one is under 16 and one is between 16 and 18.  In that specific case, the older child’s adoption can be valid for immigration purposes.

The other main type of adoption that will not work for immigration purposes is if a US citizen goes abroad and adopts a child but does not live abroad with that child for two years.   That may be a legal adoption, but it will not provide any immigration benefits unless the US citizen can live abroad with the child for two years.

I hope this is interesting and helpful.   Remember that this is not legal advice.  It is just a summary of certain aspects of immigration law which may or may not apply to your situation.   I encourage you to consult an attorney if you think any of this may apply to your situation.

Gunnar Armstrong

 

Hague Convention Adoptions

As I stated two weeks ago, the Hague Convention Adoption process is expensive, difficult and time-consuming.   I am not saying that you should not do it — many parents have persevered and completed the process, but you need to be prepared for difficulties, for waiting, for frustration and for the outlay of large amounts of money.  This is true for any adoption, but more so for international adoptions, and even more so if the international adoption is done through the Hague Convention — which covers most international adoptions.  In order to do a Hague International Adoption, you need to work through an accredited agency.   You will need to satisfy all the laws of your home state, the US government and the foreign government.   You will need to have a home study done.   Once you have applied for adoption and been approved, your information is sent to the desired country where they will choose a baby for you.  The child that they choose has to be an orphan or abandoned.    You normally cannot choose the child yourself unless it is a relative, or, I believe, disabled.  In fact, you are not even allowed to have met the child unless it is a relative, or, I believe, disabled.  In addition, the match needs to be approved by the child’s country which can be a long and difficult process.  Finally, once everything has been completed and approved, you file a petition to bring the child here to the US for adoption and the grant of US citizenship.   In order to complete this process, the petition has to be filed before the child turns 16.    As long as the petition is filed before the child turns 16, he will be able to immigrate, be adopted and become a US citizen.  The adoption can also be completed in the foreign country before the child comes to the US.  As you can see, the process has to start well before the child turns 16 if you will be able to complete all the preliminary steps and be able to file the petition before the child turns 16.

I hope this is interesting and helpful.   Remember that this is not legal advice.  It is just a summary of certain aspects of immigration law which may or may not apply to your situation.   I encourage you to consult an attorney if you think any of this may apply to your situation.

Gunnar Armstrong